Answer to a notification of prior checking of a processing for the issuing and checking of passes giving access to the European Commission's buildings in Brussels and Luxembourg (Case 2004-235)
Opinion of 29 September 2009 on a notification for prior checking concerning the "Security Support System" (Case 2009-225)
The collection of data in the Security Support System has the purpose to provide support to missions outside the three places of work of the EP in case of medical emergencies. The information is provided by the data subject on a voluntary basis. Data will only be used in emergency situations and only given to local health staff if needed.
Opinion of 29 April 2009 on a notification for prior checking on Voice Logging at the Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy (JRC-IE) in Petten (Case 2008-014)
This case concerned the recording of incoming and outgoing calls as well as records the calling telephone number, the called telephone number, date, time and length of the conversation at the JRC-IE in Petten the purpose of being able to check the content of the calls to the lines concerned in the event of an operational incident, emergencies and to be able to evaluate emergency training exercises at a later stage. These calls may also furnish evidence for investigations into potential threats to the institution.
The EDPS opinion particularly examines the lawfulness of the processing operation as the recording of calls is a violation to the principle of confidentiality of communications. The EDPS acknowledged that the processing was lawful as based on mandatory national legislation applicable in the field of nuclear facilities. The EDPS also made recommendations on the information to the persons concerned notably to external persons calling the switchboard and who must be informed that the communication will be recorded for security purposes at the start of the call.
Opinion of 15 December 2008 on a notification for prior checking regarding the database ARDOS (Case 2007-380)
The Security Service of the Joint Research Centre (JRC) at Ispra put in place a processing operation called "nulla osta". The purpose of the "nulla osta" procedure is to ascertain and confirm a selected candidate's good conduct. Information collected through this procedure is stored in a database called ARDOS with all documents requested by and presented to the Security Service of the JRC Ispra. It has to be noted that the "nulla osta" processing operation concern the candidates of all JRC sites except Karlsruhe.
The EDPS examined the processing operation and in particular the legal basis provided by the JRC Ispra to conduct such assessment of the candidate's good conduct. The EDPS concluded that the processing operation appears to be in breach of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 unless a clear legal basis is identified, produced or established by the institution. Indeed the processing operation described by the Security Service goes far beyond a checking of the candidate's good conduct, notably by collecting excessive and non relevant data (data quality principle).
The EDPS moreover recommended that in order to ensure compliance with the Regulation, the JRC Ispra should made several amendments to the privacy statement to fully respect the information that should be given to the data subject following Article 12 of the Regulation. The EDPS also insisted on the fact that the retention period foreseen by the institution should be implemented as soon as possible.
Cyber security is not an excuse for the unlimited monitoring and analysis of the personal information of individuals, said the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) today following the publication of his opinion on the EU's strategy on cyber security.
This report provides an overview of the activities carried out by the EDPS from 2015-2019. In particular, it focuses on how the EDPS has worked towards implementing the objectives set out in the EDPS Strategy 2015-2019, which relate to digitisation, global partnerships and the modernisation of data protection. This involved not only contributing historical pieces of legislation, such as the General Data Protection Regulation and Regulation 2018/1725, but also bringing the concepts of ethics and accountability to the forefront of data protection discourse and application.