Print

Opinions Prior Check and Prior Consultations

Some of the procedures that EU institutions put in place pose risks to the data protection rights and freedoms of individuals.

Under the old legal framework (Regulation (EC) 45/2001), EU institutions were obliged to notify us before putting in place risky data processing operations.

In general, our prior checking Opinions were public.

Regulation 2018/1725 builds on the old Regulation and mirrors the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) that applies to most organisations processing personal data in the Member States. Compared to the previous rules, Regulation 2018/1725 aligns documentation obligations more closely to the risks caused by processing personal data. This means for example that the documentation requirements for a EUI’s newsletter subscription will be lower than for a system using ‘intelligent CCTV’ covering publicly accessible space or a database profiling travellers for screening purposes.

Depending on the process at hand, EU institutions processing personal data ('controllers') may not have to go through all the steps below (these steps are described in the Accountability on the ground toolkit): 
• Generate basic documentation (called ‘records’) for all processes; 
• Check if the process is likely to result in high risks to the people whose data are processed and consult the DPO if it appears to do so; 
• If the EU institution needs to do a data protection impact assessment (DPIA), they analyse those risks in more detail and develop specific safeguards/controls to manage them; 
• If the results of the DPIA still indicate high residual data protection risks, the EU institution has to file a prior consultation with the EDPS (see Articles 40 and 90 of Regulation 2018/1725 respectively for administrative and operational personal data).

Article 39 of Regulation 2016/794 on Europol provides for an ad hoc prior consultation mechanism for new type of processing of operational data, namely data processed by Europol to support the Member States in preventing and combating serious crime and terrorism. Similarly, Article 72 of Regulation 2017/1939 on the European Public Prosecutor Office (EPPO) provides a specific prior consultation mechanism for the processing of operational data, namely data processed in the context of criminal investigations and prosecutions undertaken by the EPPO. Regulation 2018/1725, including the standard prior consultation mechanism, applies to Europol's and EPPO's processing of administrative data, which includes data on staff and visitors, for example.

Where an EU institution is unsure whether to notify us a data processing operation for prior consultation, their DPO can consult us for advice to confirm.

As for the old prior checking Opinions, in general the prior consultation Opinions are public, but we may delete sensitive elements where necessary, related to security for example. Some opinions, which are by nature sensitive, in particular in the police and justice area, may not be published. For the sake of transparency, these Opinions are summarised in our Annual Report.

Filters

8
Dec
2009

Selection of a Director for EIGE - Parliament

The European Parliament takes part in auditions of candidates selected by the European Commission for the post of Director for the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) then appointed by the Management Board. The EDPS prior checked the processing of personal data by the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM Committee) in the audition procedure and made specific recommendations notably on the information to be provided to the candidates.

Available languages: English
7
Dec
2009

EudraVigilance Data Quality Management system - EMEA

Opinion reflected in a letter of 7 December 2009 on the notification for prior checking of the EudraVigilance Data Quality Management system (Case 2009-740)

Available languages: English, French
5
Dec
2009

Calls for tenders - European Investment Bank

Opinion of 5 December 2009 on calls for tenders (Case 2007-126)

The purpose of the processing operation is to assess the technical and professional abilities of candidates having regard to the calls for tenders and to select the best tenderers capable of fulfilling the terms of the published contract notice.  The purpose of the processing operation is not to exclude (Article 27(2)(d)) candidates from being selected and awarded a contract, but to assess their abilities and their financial data on the basis of general and specific criteria, including the specifications, with a view to their being considered for a contract (Article 27(2)(b)).  Furthermore, extracts from criminal records are collected as part of the assessment and selection of candidates for the award of a contract in the framework of the specifications.  This is why the processing operation falls within the scope of the prior checking procedure on the basis of Articles 27(2)(a) and 27(2)(b) of the Regulation respectively.

As part of his recommendations, the EDPS advised the EIB to adopt a new data retention period in the case of candidates who are awarded a contract; that period should be reasonable and proportionate for achieving the purpose of processing, without prejudice to specific retention in the case of disputes and complaints.  In addition, the EDPS stressed that the "Privacy statement" information note should be communicated to data subjects when the invitation concerning the call for tenders notice is issued and when the prospective contract is to be signed by the successful tenderer.

Available languages: English, French