Print

Opinions Prior Check and Prior Consultations

Some of the procedures that EU institutions put in place pose risks to the data protection rights and freedoms of individuals.

Under the old legal framework (Regulation (EC) 45/2001), EU institutions were obliged to notify us before putting in place risky data processing operations.

In general, our prior checking Opinions were public.

Regulation 2018/1725 builds on the old Regulation and mirrors the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) that applies to most organisations processing personal data in the Member States. Compared to the previous rules, Regulation 2018/1725 aligns documentation obligations more closely to the risks caused by processing personal data. This means for example that the documentation requirements for a EUI’s newsletter subscription will be lower than for a system using ‘intelligent CCTV’ covering publicly accessible space or a database profiling travellers for screening purposes.

Depending on the process at hand, EU institutions processing personal data ('controllers') may not have to go through all the steps below (these steps are described in the Accountability on the ground toolkit): 
• Generate basic documentation (called ‘records’) for all processes; 
• Check if the process is likely to result in high risks to the people whose data are processed and consult the DPO if it appears to do so; 
• If the EU institution needs to do a data protection impact assessment (DPIA), they analyse those risks in more detail and develop specific safeguards/controls to manage them; 
• If the results of the DPIA still indicate high residual data protection risks, the EU institution has to file a prior consultation with the EDPS (see Articles 40 and 90 of Regulation 2018/1725 respectively for administrative and operational personal data).

Article 39 of Regulation 2016/794 on Europol provides for an ad hoc prior consultation mechanism for new type of processing of operational data, namely data processed by Europol to support the Member States in preventing and combating serious crime and terrorism. Similarly, Article 72 of Regulation 2017/1939 on the European Public Prosecutor Office (EPPO) provides a specific prior consultation mechanism for the processing of operational data, namely data processed in the context of criminal investigations and prosecutions undertaken by the EPPO. Regulation 2018/1725, including the standard prior consultation mechanism, applies to Europol's and EPPO's processing of administrative data, which includes data on staff and visitors, for example.

Where an EU institution is unsure whether to notify us a data processing operation for prior consultation, their DPO can consult us for advice to confirm.

As for the old prior checking Opinions, in general the prior consultation Opinions are public, but we may delete sensitive elements where necessary, related to security for example. Some opinions, which are by nature sensitive, in particular in the police and justice area, may not be published. For the sake of transparency, these Opinions are summarised in our Annual Report.

Filters

5
Jun
2009

Administering traineeships - Commission

Opinion of 5 June 2009 on the notification for prior checking regarding the "Application for administering traineeships" (Case 2008-485)

The European Commission has a department responsible for administering the procedures for selecting and recruiting Commission trainees.

The EDPS has examined the processing of personal data under these procedures and has concluded that the processing operation does not appear to involve any breach of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, provided that certain recommendations are followed, in particular that the department responsible reassesses the categories of data stored and their respective storage periods, verifies on a case-by-case basis that the data transfer is necessary and that only relevant data are transferred, and guarantees the right of access to evaluations carried out as part of the process for recruiting trainees.

Available languages: English, French
4
Jun
2009

Annual dialogue - ETF

Opinion of 4 May 2009 on a notification for prior checking concerning "ETF annual dialogue" (Case 2009-168)

This notification concerns the processing of personal data in the exercise of yearly evaluation of staff members of ETF.

The EDPS made recommendations in particular relating to data retention period, the right of blocking and the privacy statement to be given to the data subjects

Available languages: English, French
20
May
2009

Safety at work at JRC - Commission

Opinion of 20 May 2009 on the notification for prior checking regarding the management of safety at work at the Joint Research Centre's Institute for Health and Consumer Protection in Ispra (Case 2008-541)

The Notification and the EDPS Opinion concern a dedicated filing system: "Management of Safety at Work" used by the Institute. Personal data with an implication for safety at work are collected and stored in this filing system and consulted when needed. The purpose of the processing is to comply with the employer's obligations on safety at work under Italian laws. The processing operation covers all employees of the Institute.

With regard to data quality and proportionality, the EDPS recommended that the Institute should reconsider whether the safety officer indeed needs direct access to general training data in SYSLOG Formation, as well as training data on languages and e-learning, in addition to training information directly relevant to safety at work. On rights of access, the EDPS recommended that the Institution should establish a minimum set of safeguards to ensure that access requests will be addressed in a timely manner and without restraints. With regard to information to data subjects, the EDPS recommended that notice with respect to certain items under Articles 11 and 12 of the Regulation should be provided in a more specific manner.

Available languages: English, French
19
May
2009

Prevention of harassment - Parliament

Opinion of 19 May 2009 on the notification for prior checking regarding the prevention of harassment (Case 2008-477)

The Advisory Committee on Harassment and its Prevention at the Workplace functions in the European Parliament with the multiple purpose of promoting a peaceful and productive working environment, preventing and/or stopping harassment of staff (officials and other servants) of the European Parliament (EP), playing a role of conciliation and mediation, training and information and playing an active role within the EP's existing health promotion network. The ACPH combats psychological and sexual harassment on the basis of complaints. In the framework of its activities, the ACPH can process various personal data, including sensitive data, related to a particular individual.

After careful analysis of the data processing activities, the EDPS advised to improve different aspects of the processing, inter alia, regarding the confidentiality of handling personal data, reconsidering the retention period and drawing up a privacy notice and provide personalised information to the person concerned.

Available languages: English, French
19
May
2009

Entreprise Data Warehouse - Commission

Opinion of 19 May 2009 on the notification for prior checking regarding the processing of personal data in DG ENTR Entreprise Data Warehouse (Case 2008-487)

The DG ENTR Data Warehouse (EDW) is a system in charge of retrieving data from multiple data sources (ABAC, COMREF, SYSLOG and DG ENTR's in-house financial data). The main goal is to provide managers with powerful reports presenting metrics of performance, like the 'Scoreboard' report, at destination of the Head of Units, Directors and Director General.

The EDPS examined the processing in the light of the legal requirements of Regulation (EC) 45/2001 and concluded that there was no breach of the Regulation provided certain recommendations are taken into account and notably:

  • The Data Warehouse should be limited to the use of data specified in the current notification and require further authorisation if other databases where to be added as database sources;
  • The data minimization principles, the accuracy of data and the necessity to transfer them should be assessed and evaluated;
  • DG ENTR should implement specific security measures relating to the planned system's specifications.
Available languages: English, French