Print

Opinions Prior Check and Prior Consultations

Some of the procedures that EU institutions put in place pose risks to the data protection rights and freedoms of individuals.

Under the old legal framework (Regulation (EC) 45/2001), EU institutions were obliged to notify us before putting in place risky data processing operations.

In general, our prior checking Opinions were public.

Regulation 2018/1725 builds on the old Regulation and mirrors the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) that applies to most organisations processing personal data in the Member States. Compared to the previous rules, Regulation 2018/1725 aligns documentation obligations more closely to the risks caused by processing personal data. This means for example that the documentation requirements for a EUI’s newsletter subscription will be lower than for a system using ‘intelligent CCTV’ covering publicly accessible space or a database profiling travellers for screening purposes.

Depending on the process at hand, EU institutions processing personal data ('controllers') may not have to go through all the steps below (these steps are described in the Accountability on the ground toolkit): 
• Generate basic documentation (called ‘records’) for all processes; 
• Check if the process is likely to result in high risks to the people whose data are processed and consult the DPO if it appears to do so; 
• If the EU institution needs to do a data protection impact assessment (DPIA), they analyse those risks in more detail and develop specific safeguards/controls to manage them; 
• If the results of the DPIA still indicate high residual data protection risks, the EU institution has to file a prior consultation with the EDPS (see Articles 40 and 90 of Regulation 2018/1725 respectively for administrative and operational personal data).

Article 39 of Regulation 2016/794 on Europol provides for an ad hoc prior consultation mechanism for new type of processing of operational data, namely data processed by Europol to support the Member States in preventing and combating serious crime and terrorism. Similarly, Article 72 of Regulation 2017/1939 on the European Public Prosecutor Office (EPPO) provides a specific prior consultation mechanism for the processing of operational data, namely data processed in the context of criminal investigations and prosecutions undertaken by the EPPO. Regulation 2018/1725, including the standard prior consultation mechanism, applies to Europol's and EPPO's processing of administrative data, which includes data on staff and visitors, for example.

Where an EU institution is unsure whether to notify us a data processing operation for prior consultation, their DPO can consult us for advice to confirm.

As for the old prior checking Opinions, in general the prior consultation Opinions are public, but we may delete sensitive elements where necessary, related to security for example. Some opinions, which are by nature sensitive, in particular in the police and justice area, may not be published. For the sake of transparency, these Opinions are summarised in our Annual Report.

Filters

18
May
2009

Trainee applications and recruitment - EMEA

Opinion of 18 May 2009 on a notification for prior checking regarding trainee applications and recruitment (Case 2008-730)
The prior check concerned the processing of personal data in the collection of trainee selection and recruitment. The EDPS examined the processing in the light of the legal requirements of Regulation (EC) 45/2001 and concluded that there was no breach of the Regulation provided certain recommendations are taken into account and notably as concerns requests made to the medical service in case of requests for a disability allowance by the trainees. The Personnel and Budget Sector should limit its request to the medical service to disability related data which is strictly necessary for making a decision about the needs of the trainee and the amount of the additional grant to be supplied to disabled trainees and persons in charge of handling that data in the Personnel sector should be made aware that they are processing sensitive information and they should respect the confidentiality requirement.

Available languages: English, French
18
May
2009

Promotion and regrading procedure - CdT

Opinion of 18 May 2009 on the notification for prior checking concerning the promotion and regrading procedure case (Case 2009-018)

The prior checking relates to the processing of personal data in the context of the Translation Centre's promotion/regrading procedure.  The procedure is based on an individual promotion/regrading form which is circulated between the different groups of users concerned.  The promotion/regrading forms might also be transferred to other Community institutions and agencies if an official/temporary staff member transfers, or applies for a transfer, to another institution/agency.  There is also a promotion file composed of individual promotion/regrading forms, the list of officials and temporary staff members eligible for promotion/regrading and the list of officials promoted.  The promotion files are kept until officials/temporary staff members (or their dependants) have exhausted all channels of appeal after termination of service and for no longer than ten years as from the last pension payment.

After examining the case, the EDPS reached the conclusion that only relevant data should be stored in the data subject's personal file; that only relevant data should be transferred to another institution in the event of the data subject's transfer there; and that the specific information note should include the general information headings.

Available languages: English, French
18
May
2009

Mediation Service - Commission

Opinion of 18 May 2009 on the notification for prior checking on the "Mediation Service of the European Commission" (Case 2009-010)

The European Commission has a Mediation Service which provides impartial advice to each official, servant or department that consults it. That Service intervenes if a case is submitted to it by an individual or a Commission department and may hear the persons concerned and request information from the Commission departments concerned. The role of the Mediation Service is to reconcile the administration and the staff. It makes recommendations and gives opinions, but has no power of decision.

The EDPS has examined the processing of personal data in managing absences owing to illnesses and has concluded that it does not seem to involve any infringement of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, provided that certain recommendations are implemented, in particular that the competent department checks the appropriateness of the transfer on a case by case basis and ensures that only relevant data are transferred; reminds data recipients that they may process the data they receive only for the purposes for which they are transmitted; applies the right of access and rectification to anyone whose personal data are processed; makes the specific confidentiality statement available on the Commission intranet site, and, if necessary, informs other persons whose data are being processed.

Available languages: English, French
8
May
2009

TFlow and PROFIL - Parliament

Opinion of 8 May 2009 on a notification for prior checking regarding the processing operation "TFlow" and "PROFIL" (Case 2009-069)

This notification covers two linked applications (TFlow and PROFIL).

The purpose of the processing is the management of workload in the translation units of the European Parliament. Moreover, while the primary purpose of the use of the data is for allocation and practical workflow management, including assessing workload and capacity, the notification states that the data may be taken into account for staff assessment and appraisal purposes.

Available languages: English, French