Print

Opinions Prior Check and Prior Consultations

Some of the procedures that EU institutions put in place pose risks to the data protection rights and freedoms of individuals.

Under the old legal framework (Regulation (EC) 45/2001), EU institutions were obliged to notify us before putting in place risky data processing operations.

In general, our prior checking Opinions were public.

Regulation 2018/1725 builds on the old Regulation and mirrors the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) that applies to most organisations processing personal data in the Member States. Compared to the previous rules, Regulation 2018/1725 aligns documentation obligations more closely to the risks caused by processing personal data. This means for example that the documentation requirements for a EUI’s newsletter subscription will be lower than for a system using ‘intelligent CCTV’ covering publicly accessible space or a database profiling travellers for screening purposes.

Depending on the process at hand, EU institutions processing personal data ('controllers') may not have to go through all the steps below (these steps are described in the Accountability on the ground toolkit): 
• Generate basic documentation (called ‘records’) for all processes; 
• Check if the process is likely to result in high risks to the people whose data are processed and consult the DPO if it appears to do so; 
• If the EU institution needs to do a data protection impact assessment (DPIA), they analyse those risks in more detail and develop specific safeguards/controls to manage them; 
• If the results of the DPIA still indicate high residual data protection risks, the EU institution has to file a prior consultation with the EDPS (see Articles 40 and 90 of Regulation 2018/1725 respectively for administrative and operational personal data).

Article 39 of Regulation 2016/794 on Europol provides for an ad hoc prior consultation mechanism for new type of processing of operational data, namely data processed by Europol to support the Member States in preventing and combating serious crime and terrorism. Similarly, Article 72 of Regulation 2017/1939 on the European Public Prosecutor Office (EPPO) provides a specific prior consultation mechanism for the processing of operational data, namely data processed in the context of criminal investigations and prosecutions undertaken by the EPPO. Regulation 2018/1725, including the standard prior consultation mechanism, applies to Europol's and EPPO's processing of administrative data, which includes data on staff and visitors, for example.

Where an EU institution is unsure whether to notify us a data processing operation for prior consultation, their DPO can consult us for advice to confirm.

As for the old prior checking Opinions, in general the prior consultation Opinions are public, but we may delete sensitive elements where necessary, related to security for example. Some opinions, which are by nature sensitive, in particular in the police and justice area, may not be published. For the sake of transparency, these Opinions are summarised in our Annual Report.

Filters

17
Sep
2008

Career mobility - Parliament

Opinion of 17 September 2008 on a notification for prior checking regarding the "Career Mobility" (Case 2008-329)
This prior checking concerns the data processing operations that take place in the context of the processing for career mobility purposes at the European Parliament. The processing is carried out by the Internal Organisation Unit of the DG for Personnel as well as by the Career Counselling and Professional Guidance Service. The Opinion recommends the data controller to implement various data protection safeguards towards ensuring full compliance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001. Among others, the EDPS suggests setting up storage periods, ensuring that individuals have the right of access to their data and amending the information notice.

Available languages: English, French
16
Sep
2008

Flexitime interface-PersonaGrata - Council

Opinion of 16 September 2008 on the notification for prior checking regarding the "Flexitime interface-PersonaGrata (DGA3) dossier (Case 2008-324)

This prior check by the European Data Protection Supervisor is the first to be based on Article 27(2)(c), which provides for the prior checking of "processing operations allowing linkages not provided for pursuant to national or Community legislation between data processed for different purposes". The purpose of the interface between Flexitime and PersonaGrata at the Council is to make it possible to prevent duplication of the work of encoding data considered as equivalent between the two databases with the dangers of error that that entails, and thus to ensure consistency between the two databases, improve the efficiency of personnel management in the departments and units and to provide more reliable information. As regards the clocking data, the purpose of the interface is to export those data from the Flexitime database to the PersonaGrata system.

The EDPS' main recommendations for the interface between Flexitime and PersonaGrata concern compliance with the rules laid down for the Flexitime case (including those on the provision of information to data subjects and the data storage period), to maintain consistency between these two cases. The EDPS also asks that there should be a specific procedure for saving data in connection with that interface.

Available languages: English, French