Print

Opinions Prior Check and Prior Consultations

Some of the procedures that EU institutions put in place pose risks to the data protection rights and freedoms of individuals.

Under the old legal framework (Regulation (EC) 45/2001), EU institutions were obliged to notify us before putting in place risky data processing operations.

In general, our prior checking Opinions were public.

Regulation 2018/1725 builds on the old Regulation and mirrors the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) that applies to most organisations processing personal data in the Member States. Compared to the previous rules, Regulation 2018/1725 aligns documentation obligations more closely to the risks caused by processing personal data. This means for example that the documentation requirements for a EUI’s newsletter subscription will be lower than for a system using ‘intelligent CCTV’ covering publicly accessible space or a database profiling travellers for screening purposes.

Depending on the process at hand, EU institutions processing personal data ('controllers') may not have to go through all the steps below (these steps are described in the Accountability on the ground toolkit): 
• Generate basic documentation (called ‘records’) for all processes; 
• Check if the process is likely to result in high risks to the people whose data are processed and consult the DPO if it appears to do so; 
• If the EU institution needs to do a data protection impact assessment (DPIA), they analyse those risks in more detail and develop specific safeguards/controls to manage them; 
• If the results of the DPIA still indicate high residual data protection risks, the EU institution has to file a prior consultation with the EDPS (see Articles 40 and 90 of Regulation 2018/1725 respectively for administrative and operational personal data).

Article 39 of Regulation 2016/794 on Europol provides for an ad hoc prior consultation mechanism for new type of processing of operational data, namely data processed by Europol to support the Member States in preventing and combating serious crime and terrorism. Similarly, Article 72 of Regulation 2017/1939 on the European Public Prosecutor Office (EPPO) provides a specific prior consultation mechanism for the processing of operational data, namely data processed in the context of criminal investigations and prosecutions undertaken by the EPPO. Regulation 2018/1725, including the standard prior consultation mechanism, applies to Europol's and EPPO's processing of administrative data, which includes data on staff and visitors, for example.

Where an EU institution is unsure whether to notify us a data processing operation for prior consultation, their DPO can consult us for advice to confirm.

As for the old prior checking Opinions, in general the prior consultation Opinions are public, but we may delete sensitive elements where necessary, related to security for example. Some opinions, which are by nature sensitive, in particular in the police and justice area, may not be published. For the sake of transparency, these Opinions are summarised in our Annual Report.

Filters

7
Jan
2008

Probationary period reports - European Maritime Safety Agency

Opinion of 7 January 2008 on a notification for prior checking concerning "probationary period reports" (Case 2007-569)

Personal data processed within Probationary Period Reports are used for the evaluation of the initial performance of the respective temporary and contract agent in view of their possible establishment (or dismissal). In addition, the reports may be used for the follow-up of the individual training need, as well as provide a basis for the first annual career development review. 
 
The EDPS recommendations provided in this opinion aim to ensure the full compliance with the Regulation 45/2001 and concern, in particular, the information to be provided to the data subjects.
Available languages: English, French
19
Dec
2007

Contrôle qualité du travail et gestion du ranking - Centre de Traduction

Avis du 19 décembre 2007 sur la notification d'un contrôle préalable à propos du dossier "Contrôle qualité d'un travail de traduction d'un contractant freelance et gestion du ranking" (Dossier 2007-154)

Available languages: French
18
Dec
2007

Fraud notification service - OLAF

Opinion of 18 December 2007 on a notification for prior checking on the fraud notification service (Case 2007-481)

The Fraud Notification Service is a web based information system that OLAF has put at the public's disposal in order to facilitate the collection of information to use in the fight against fraud, corruption and other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Community.  Members of the public can provide the information by completing a questionnaire and they can register to have two-way communications with OLAF. The messages are reviewed automatically and also by review officers. Upon review of the information, OLAF decides whether the matter merits initiation of the assessment stage, or should be classified as a prima facie non-case. If an assessment is initiated, then the matter will be assigned a CMS number and the investigator will place all information received through the system in the CMS file.
 
In his opinion, the EDPS concluded that OLAF should implement certain recommendations, including: 
  • ensuring the deletion of pointless messages as well as avoiding asking questions that would lead informants to disclose information that is irrelevant for the purposes of detecting fraud and corruption affecting the financial interests of the Community.
  • ensuring the right to information, access and rectification to those who have been named by the users of the Fraud Notification Service, subject to the application of the exceptions provided for in the Regulation.
  • ensuring that the conservation period of irrelevant information is kept as short as possible and in any event for no longer than one year.
  • inserting a link in the privacy policy at the webpage through which visitors who want to use the Fraud Notification Service must necessarily go through or alternatively in a very prominent way, immediately after or before the information on the Fraud Notification Service.
Available languages: English, French
17
Dec
2007

Career development - European Maritime Safety Agency

Opinion of 17 December 2007 on a notification for prior checking concerning "Annual career development" (Case 2007-568)

All officials, temporary and contractual agents working for the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) are subject to yearly evaluation reports concerning their ability, efficiency and conduct. The purpose of the data processing in question is the subsequent career development review, promotion/reclassification exercise, follow-up of individual training plans and renewal of temporary agent or contract agent contract.
 

The EDPS has issued an opinion on the evaluation of the EMSA staff. The EDPS concludes that on a general basis the procedure complies with the principles established in the data protection regulation. However the EDPS did make some recommendations mainly as concerns the need to collect some data, the information of the persons concerned as well as the appropriate time-limit for the storage of data.

Available languages: English, French