Print

Opinions Prior Check and Prior Consultations

Some of the procedures that EU institutions put in place pose risks to the data protection rights and freedoms of individuals.

Under the old legal framework (Regulation (EC) 45/2001), EU institutions were obliged to notify us before putting in place risky data processing operations.

In general, our prior checking Opinions were public.

Regulation 2018/1725 builds on the old Regulation and mirrors the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) that applies to most organisations processing personal data in the Member States. Compared to the previous rules, Regulation 2018/1725 aligns documentation obligations more closely to the risks caused by processing personal data. This means for example that the documentation requirements for a EUI’s newsletter subscription will be lower than for a system using ‘intelligent CCTV’ covering publicly accessible space or a database profiling travellers for screening purposes.

Depending on the process at hand, EU institutions processing personal data ('controllers') may not have to go through all the steps below (these steps are described in the Accountability on the ground toolkit): 
• Generate basic documentation (called ‘records’) for all processes; 
• Check if the process is likely to result in high risks to the people whose data are processed and consult the DPO if it appears to do so; 
• If the EU institution needs to do a data protection impact assessment (DPIA), they analyse those risks in more detail and develop specific safeguards/controls to manage them; 
• If the results of the DPIA still indicate high residual data protection risks, the EU institution has to file a prior consultation with the EDPS (see Articles 40 and 90 of Regulation 2018/1725 respectively for administrative and operational personal data).

Article 39 of Regulation 2016/794 on Europol provides for an ad hoc prior consultation mechanism for new type of processing of operational data, namely data processed by Europol to support the Member States in preventing and combating serious crime and terrorism. Similarly, Article 72 of Regulation 2017/1939 on the European Public Prosecutor Office (EPPO) provides a specific prior consultation mechanism for the processing of operational data, namely data processed in the context of criminal investigations and prosecutions undertaken by the EPPO. Regulation 2018/1725, including the standard prior consultation mechanism, applies to Europol's and EPPO's processing of administrative data, which includes data on staff and visitors, for example.

Where an EU institution is unsure whether to notify us a data processing operation for prior consultation, their DPO can consult us for advice to confirm.

As for the old prior checking Opinions, in general the prior consultation Opinions are public, but we may delete sensitive elements where necessary, related to security for example. Some opinions, which are by nature sensitive, in particular in the police and justice area, may not be published. For the sake of transparency, these Opinions are summarised in our Annual Report.

Filters

20
Jul
2016

Selection of confidential counsellors - EIGE

Prior-check Opinion concerning the selection of confidential counsellors at the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (Case 2016-0408)

Available languages: German, English, French
20
Jul
2016

Administrative inquiries and disciplinary proceedings - CPVO

Follow-up prior-check Opinion on administrative inquiries and disciplinary proceedings at the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (Case 2011-1128)

Available languages: German, English, French
4
Jul
2016

Individual performance indicators - CPVO

Prior-check Opinion concerning the individual performance indicators for the annual evaluation of staff members at the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (Case 2016-0417)

Personal data collected during an employer's core business activities are sometimes further used to produce productivity reports of employees to feed the evaluation process. This further use of personal data is a change of the initial purpose (linked to the core business) and should therefore be based on specific and explicit internal rules. Employees must be made aware of the change of purpose to ensure fair processing of their personal information. In addition, this information can only be used as a support tool for the annual evaluation of employees and not as the only source to feed the evaluation process.

4
Jul
2016

Anti-fraud reporting procedure - EACEA

Prior-check Opinion on the anti-fraud reporting procedure at the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) (Case 2013-0884)

Available languages: German, English, French