Evaluation of interpreters - Parliament
Opinion of 5 December 2008 on a notification for prior checking concerning the evaluation of interpreters (Case 2008-578)
Opinion of 5 December 2008 on a notification for prior checking concerning the evaluation of interpreters (Case 2008-578)
Opinion of 26 November 2008 on a notification for prior checking regarding the "certification procedure" case (Case 2008-475)
The Economic and Social Committee organises a procedure to select officials to be authorised to participate in training in the framework of the certification procedure, under Article 45a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities. The processing operation consists of the receipt, processing and analysis of applications received in the framework of the certification procedure which enables staff at grade AST 5 and above to be appointed as administrators.
The proposed processing does not appear to involve any infringement of the provision of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, so long as the European Economic and Social Committee guarantees the rights of access to the files and the data quality, informs recipients that they may not use the data for other purposes, reassesses the data storage period and reviews the information provided and how it is provided.
Opinion of 25 November 2008 on a notification for prior checking concerning "Probationary Period Reports" (Case 2008-432)
OHIM Reporting Officers draft Probationary Period Reports and Management Capacities Assessments which aim to assess the performance of newly recruited officials and temporary/contractual agents as well as the management competences of officials appointed in management positions. The processing is carried out under the responsibility of OHIM Career and Development Sector which is part of the OHIM Human Resources Department.
The Prior Check Opinion gives recommendations to ensure full compliance with Regulation 45/2001, in particular, among others, it suggests that OHIIM (i) sets out an appropriate time-limit for the storage of the personal files; (ii) reminds all recipients of their obligation not to use the data received for any further purpose than the one for which they were transmitted and, (iii) inserts in the "Probation Period Report" data protection information in light of Article 12 of the Regulation as suggested in this Opinion.
Opinion of 7 November 2008 on the notification for prior checking regarding the Internal Promotion of Officials and Regrading of Temporary Agents (Case 2008-095)
Opinion of 22 October 2008 on the notification for prior checking regarding quality checks (Case 2008-437)
This prior checking notification followed upon staff complaints and was only submitted to the EPPS upon his specific request. It concerns a system of internal quality checks during which (i) the work products of OHIM's trademark examiners are reviewed and (ii) the results are reported in a database created for this purpose. The primary purpose of these systematic checks is to improve the overall quality of OHIM's work products. However, the results of the quality checks (i) are also used to evaluate the quality of work of each examiner and (ii) inform management decisions regarding measures that may individually affect the examiners, such as performance appraisals, promotion, contract renewals, disciplinary measures, or training.
The EDPS recommended the adoption of a clear and formal internal decision to strengthen the legal basis of the operation and provide much needed clarity and certainty to staff members. This decision should clearly describe the system of the ex-ante quality checks, including their intended purpose, and provide for appropriate data protection safeguards, as recommended in the Opinion. Instead of fragmental email-communications, the EDPS also urged OHIM to adopt a formal data protection notice and make it available permanently on OHIM's intranet site. In addition, the EDPS emphasised that all possible efforts should be made to improve the level of accuracy, reliability, and consistency of the data. In any event, data included in the database should only be used as one of several factors to be considered in the decision-making process. Whenever data stored in the database are used for purposes which may individually affect staff members, they must also be heard and be given the opportunity to put forward their positions.