Print

Opinions Prior Check and Prior Consultations

Some of the procedures that EU institutions put in place pose risks to the data protection rights and freedoms of individuals.

Under the old legal framework (Regulation (EC) 45/2001), EU institutions were obliged to notify us before putting in place risky data processing operations.

In general, our prior checking Opinions were public.

Regulation 2018/1725 builds on the old Regulation and mirrors the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) that applies to most organisations processing personal data in the Member States. Compared to the previous rules, Regulation 2018/1725 aligns documentation obligations more closely to the risks caused by processing personal data. This means for example that the documentation requirements for a EUI’s newsletter subscription will be lower than for a system using ‘intelligent CCTV’ covering publicly accessible space or a database profiling travellers for screening purposes.

Depending on the process at hand, EU institutions processing personal data ('controllers') may not have to go through all the steps below (these steps are described in the Accountability on the ground toolkit): 
• Generate basic documentation (called ‘records’) for all processes; 
• Check if the process is likely to result in high risks to the people whose data are processed and consult the DPO if it appears to do so; 
• If the EU institution needs to do a data protection impact assessment (DPIA), they analyse those risks in more detail and develop specific safeguards/controls to manage them; 
• If the results of the DPIA still indicate high residual data protection risks, the EU institution has to file a prior consultation with the EDPS (see Articles 40 and 90 of Regulation 2018/1725 respectively for administrative and operational personal data).

Article 39 of Regulation 2016/794 on Europol provides for an ad hoc prior consultation mechanism for new type of processing of operational data, namely data processed by Europol to support the Member States in preventing and combating serious crime and terrorism. Similarly, Article 72 of Regulation 2017/1939 on the European Public Prosecutor Office (EPPO) provides a specific prior consultation mechanism for the processing of operational data, namely data processed in the context of criminal investigations and prosecutions undertaken by the EPPO. Regulation 2018/1725, including the standard prior consultation mechanism, applies to Europol's and EPPO's processing of administrative data, which includes data on staff and visitors, for example.

Where an EU institution is unsure whether to notify us a data processing operation for prior consultation, their DPO can consult us for advice to confirm.

As for the old prior checking Opinions, in general the prior consultation Opinions are public, but we may delete sensitive elements where necessary, related to security for example. Some opinions, which are by nature sensitive, in particular in the police and justice area, may not be published. For the sake of transparency, these Opinions are summarised in our Annual Report.

Filters

14
Apr
2008

Family leave - EMEA

Opinion of 14 April 2008 on a notification for prior checking concerning the "Family leave / Compel personnel database / Electronic document management system (EDMS)" (Case 2007-498)
Health-related personal data of family members are being processed in connection with family leave that can be granted upon application in case of medically certified serious illness or handicap of certain family relatives.
The respective medical certificates are being validated by the EMEA Personnel & Budget Sector staff and/or may be reviewed by an UK based external medical contractor.
The EDPS recommendations provided in this opinion aim to ensure the full compliance of the processing with Regulation 45/2001 and concern, in particular, data transfers, the modalities of exercise of rights of access and rectification, as well as the information to be provided to the data subjects.

Available languages: English, French
14
Apr
2008

Annual appraisal procedure - CPVO

Opinion of 14 April 2008 on a notification for prior checking on the annual appraisal procedure (Case 2007-403)
The Community Plant Variety Office conducts an appraisal procedure every calendar year for each CPVO staff member concerned. The procedure is aimed at evaluating the staff members efficiency, abilities and conduct in service, identify training needs and is used as a career development tool which justifies the submission of the procedure to prior checking by the EDPS under Article 27 (2) (b) of Regulation 45/2001. The EDPS recommendations to be implemented by the CPVO includes, inter alia,
i) Adopt rules on retention of evaluation reports;
ii) Ensure that recipients are made aware that they shall process personal data only for the purposes they were transmitted for;
iii) Ensure that more specific and accurate information is provided to data subjects regarding the data transfer, right of data subjects, the right of recourse to EDPS and the data retention. The "CPVO appraisal guide" should therefore be amended.

Available languages: English, French
7
Apr
2008

Identity and access control system - OLAF

Opinion of 7 April 2008 on a notification for prior checking on identity and access control system (Case 2007-635)
The Identity and Access Control System is part of the security infrastructure that protects OLAF premises and IT systems. The purpose of the data processing is to ensure that only authorised persons have access to OLAF's premises.  The system is designed to control the identity and permit or deny access of persons entering and exiting from OLAF's premises outside working hours and special secure zones. To do so, OLAF uses a smartcard and the use of fingerprints authentication. Users' biometrics data are stored only on the smartcard which cannot be used for any other purpose. For the EDPS, the processing operation is not in breach of Regulation 45/2001 if OLAF takes into account the following recommendations, for instance regarding a reassessment of the concerned data subjects submitted to enrolment; the development of fallback procedures; the setting of a shorter conservation period of data after the first year of operation of the new system; the amendment of the privacy statement and the reconsideration of the technological taking into consideration the choice of the best available techniques and discussions on future security systems.

Available languages: English, French
7
Apr
2008

Coordination cases - OLAF

Opinion of 7 April 2008 on a notification for prior checking on coordination cases (Case 2007-699)
OLAF engages in processing of personal data when it opens a Coordination case. These are cases that could be the subject of OLAF external investigations, but where OLAF’s role is to contribute to investigations being carried out by other national or Community services by, among other things, facilitating the gathering and exchange of information and ensuring operational synergy among the relevant national and Community services. The main investigative input is provided by other authorities. OLAF's role includes facilitating contacts and encouraging the responsible authorities to work together. The type of personal information processed by OLAF in these cases includes identification, professional data and information concerning activities related to matters which are the subject of coordination.

The EDPS has issued an opinion on the processing of personal data in the context of OLAF's Coordination cases. The Opinion concludes that on a general basis the data processing complies with the principles established in the data protection Regulation. However the EDPS did make some recommendations. Among others, the EDPS asked OLAF to ensure that individuals whose data are processed by OLAF are informed of the data processing that takes place in the context of Coordination cases. It also suggested some amendments to the privacy statement and asked OLAF to conduct a preliminary evaluation of the necessity of the 20 years conservation period vis-à-vis the purpose of such conservation.

Available languages: English, French
1
Apr
2008

Part time requests - European Medicines Agency

Opinion of 1 April 2008 on a notification for prior checking on part time requests (Case 2007-500)
The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) manages part-time applications of the staff. The data processing operations are both automated and manual. A staff member fills in a form which is collected in hard copies and subsequently the data of each staff member are entered in the COMPEL Database. Data subjects include temporary and contractual agents at the EMEA. In exceptional circumstances, the family members of staff can also be concerned.

The EDPS has issued an opinion concerning part time requests in EMEA. The EDPS concludes that on a general basis the procedure complies with the principles established in the data protection regulation. However the EDPS did make some recommendations mainly as concerns the need to modify the "Personal Data Access Request Form", to amend the information provided in the data protection declaration as well as to remind all EMEA internal recipients of their obligation not to use the data for any further purpose beyond the purposes communicated to the data subjects.

Available languages: English, French