Print

Opinions Prior Check and Prior Consultations

Some of the procedures that EU institutions put in place pose risks to the data protection rights and freedoms of individuals.

Under the old legal framework (Regulation (EC) 45/2001), EU institutions were obliged to notify us before putting in place risky data processing operations.

In general, our prior checking Opinions were public.

Regulation 2018/1725 builds on the old Regulation and mirrors the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) that applies to most organisations processing personal data in the Member States. Compared to the previous rules, Regulation 2018/1725 aligns documentation obligations more closely to the risks caused by processing personal data. This means for example that the documentation requirements for a EUI’s newsletter subscription will be lower than for a system using ‘intelligent CCTV’ covering publicly accessible space or a database profiling travellers for screening purposes.

Depending on the process at hand, EU institutions processing personal data ('controllers') may not have to go through all the steps below (these steps are described in the Accountability on the ground toolkit): 
• Generate basic documentation (called ‘records’) for all processes; 
• Check if the process is likely to result in high risks to the people whose data are processed and consult the DPO if it appears to do so; 
• If the EU institution needs to do a data protection impact assessment (DPIA), they analyse those risks in more detail and develop specific safeguards/controls to manage them; 
• If the results of the DPIA still indicate high residual data protection risks, the EU institution has to file a prior consultation with the EDPS (see Articles 40 and 90 of Regulation 2018/1725 respectively for administrative and operational personal data).

Article 39 of Regulation 2016/794 on Europol provides for an ad hoc prior consultation mechanism for new type of processing of operational data, namely data processed by Europol to support the Member States in preventing and combating serious crime and terrorism. Similarly, Article 72 of Regulation 2017/1939 on the European Public Prosecutor Office (EPPO) provides a specific prior consultation mechanism for the processing of operational data, namely data processed in the context of criminal investigations and prosecutions undertaken by the EPPO. Regulation 2018/1725, including the standard prior consultation mechanism, applies to Europol's and EPPO's processing of administrative data, which includes data on staff and visitors, for example.

Where an EU institution is unsure whether to notify us a data processing operation for prior consultation, their DPO can consult us for advice to confirm.

As for the old prior checking Opinions, in general the prior consultation Opinions are public, but we may delete sensitive elements where necessary, related to security for example. Some opinions, which are by nature sensitive, in particular in the police and justice area, may not be published. For the sake of transparency, these Opinions are summarised in our Annual Report.

Filters

7
Mar
2008

Activities of the European Administrative School and EPSO in the context of the certification procedure - Commission

Opinion of 7 March 2008 on the notification for prior checking regarding the "activities of the European Administrative School and EPSO in the context of the certification procedure" (Case 2006-396)

Available languages: English, French
14
Feb
2008

Control system by an iris scan - European Central Bank

Opinion of 14 February 2008 on a notification for prior checking related to the extension of a pre-existing access control system by an iris scan technology for high secure business areas (Case 2007-501)

The ECB has set up an access control system which, among others, scans the iris of ECB staff members and external individuals accessing highly secured areas within the ECB. The data generated by the access control system are also used to reconstruct events during security related incidents. 
 
The EDPS recommendations to be implemented by the ECB include, inter alia,
  • Enact a legal instrument providing the legal basis for the processing operations that take place in order to set up an access control system based on the use of biometrics (iris scan);
  • Reconsider the decision taken in terms of technological choices through an impact assessment, including a viable timetable to implement changes in technology, i.e. in the current iris scan system. In a first phase, consider introducing a "one to one" search mode by including an additional identification, for example, using ECB standard access badges together with the upgraded IrisAccess 4000. At a later stage, consider changing to a "one to one" search mode where biometric data would be stored in chips rather than in a central database;
  • Shorten the deadline for the storage of audit trail data which reveals whether an individual accessed or tried to access the areas controlled by the system; 
  • Amend the privacy statement as recommended in the Opinion.
Available languages: English
13
Feb
2008

Administrative enquiries and disciplinary proceedings - CEDEFOP

Opinion of 13 February 2008 on a notification for prior checking on the data processing carried out in the framework of administrative enquiries and disciplinary proceedings (Case 2007-582)

Available languages: English