Print

Privatsphäre in den EU-Organen

Die Verordnung (EU) 2018/1725 legt die Datenschutzverpflichtungen für die Organe, Einrichtungen und Agenturen der EU fest, wenn sie personenbezogene Daten verarbeiten und neue Strategien entwickeln. Darüber hinaus führt die Verordnung die Pflichten des EDSB auf. Diese umfassen seine Aufgaben als unabhängige Kontrollbehörde für die Organe und Einrichtungen der EU, wenn diese personenbezogene Daten verarbeiten, die Beratung zu politischen Maßnahmen und Rechtsvorschriften, die sich auf den Schutz der Privatsphäre auswirken, und die Zusammenarbeit mit vergleichbaren Behörden zur Gewährleistung eines kohärenten Datenschutzes.

Hier finden sich die EDSB-Dokumente über Privatsphäre und Datenschutz in Bezug auf die Verarbeitung personenbezogener Daten durch die Einrichtungen und Organe der EU, z. B. bei Mitarbeiterbewertung, Akkreditierung externer Besucher oder Zugangskontrolle.

Filters

3
Oct
2007
Opinions Prior Check and Prior Consultations

Certification procedure - Court of Justice

Opinion of 3 October 2007 on the notification for prior checking regarding the "certification procedure" dosser (Case 2007-434)

The Court of Justice adopted arrangements for implementing the certification procedure by decision of the Court's Administrative Committee of 15 June 2005. Article 45a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities (hereinafter "the Staff Regulations"), as amended by Regulation No 723/2004, enables officials in function group AST to be appointed to a post in function group AD on condition that, firstly, they have been selected by the institution to take part in a training programme, secondly, they have completed the training programme and, thirdly, they have passed examinations demonstrating that they have successfully taken part in the training programme.
 

The main recommendations made by the EDPS in the context of his opinion on the certification procedure concern the storage of data and the information supplied to data subjects.

Verfügbare Sprachen: Englisch, Französisch
Topics
Privacy in the EU Institutions
Staff Evaluation
3
Oct
2007
Opinions Prior Check and Prior Consultations

Attestation procedure - Court of Justice

Opinion of 3 October 2007 on the notification for prior checking concerning the attestation procedure (Case 2007-435)

The Court of Justice adopted the implementing rules for the attestation procedure by decision of the Court's Administrative Committee on 15 June 2005. Officials employed in categories C and D on 1 May 2004 are likely to have promotions capped at grades AST 7 and 5 respectively. These ceilings may be abolished, however, by an "attestation" procedure. This procedure is based on criteria relating to seniority, experience, merit and level of training and depends on the availability of posts in the AST function group.

The main recommendations made by the EDPS in his opinion on the attestation procedure concern data storage and the provision of information to data subjects.

Verfügbare Sprachen: Englisch, Französisch
Topics
Privacy in the EU Institutions
Working Conditions
17
Sep
2007
Opinions Prior Check and Prior Consultations

Selection of senior officials - Commission

Opinion of 17 September 2007 on a notification for prior checking regarding the selection of senior officials (Case 2007-193)

DG ADMIN organises and manages the selection process of senior officials in the Commission in order to select the best suited candidates for a particular position. The positions are open to internal candidates and in some cases vacancies are also open to external candidates.  In order to select the best suited candidates, applicants have to follow various procedures (prior eligibility tests, interviews with pre-selection panel, analysis and opinion of the Consultative Committee on Appointments, etc). Such procedures entail the collection and further processing of candidates' personal data for the purposes of evaluating their competences for a given position.   
 
In his opinion, the EDPS concluded that the DG ADMIN has substantially followed all the principles of the Regulation. Nevertheless the EDPS recommended, among others, that DG ADMIN: 
  • Clarifies and reconsiders the storage periods.
  • Limits the amount of information transferred during the first phase of the procedure
  • Ensures that applicants have access to their file. 
  • Ensure that access to the data held by the sub-contractor is not limited to an "oral feedback ".   
  • Amend the privacy policy as recommended in the Opinion.
  • Raise awareness among DG ADMIN A5 and DG ADMIN CCN-Proc regarding the need to ensure the confidentiality of the information.
  • Implement as soon as possible the security measures intended to enhance the security of the information held and exchanged electronically.
Verfügbare Sprachen: Englisch, Französisch
Topics
Privacy in the EU Institutions
Recruitment